Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02066
Original file (BC 2014 02066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02066
					COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  YES 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he was entitled to two 
stripes for his active duty time in the Marine Corps Reserves.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In Mar 55, he joined the Air Force; had two stripes and no lost 
time.  He was informed he could not enter Basic Military 
Training (BMT) with his current grade of corporal (2 stripes); 
however, once he completed BMT he would be given his stripes 
back.  

The Board should consider his untimely application in the 
interest of justice because an error was made. 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Forms 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the 
United States, Report of Separation from Active Duty, and Armed 
Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge; 
AFMPC Form 45, Retirement Order and various other documents 
associated with his request.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 27 Feb 53, the applicant enlisted in the United States Marine 
Corps (USMC) and was discharged on 28 Feb 55 in the grade of 
Corporal (Cpl).  

According to AF Form 7, on 1 Mar 55, he was placed in the 
inactive Reserve, USMC and discharged on 14 Mar 55 in the grade 
of Cpl.

On 15 Mar 55, he was placed in the active Reserve, USMC and was 
honorably discharged on 23 Mar 55 in the grade of Cpl.

On 24 Mar 55, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade 
of airman third class and was discharged on 30 Jun 73, in the 
grade of staff sergeant.  
He is credited with 20 years, 3 months and 9 days of active duty 
service.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial.  After a thorough review of the 
applicant’s personnel records and other supporting 
documentation, there appears to not be an error or injustice in 
determining his current rank.  

AFPC Enlisted Accessions confirmed the applicant entered active 
duty on 24 Mar 55 and retired from active duty on 30 Jun 73 in 
the rank of SSgt.  Based on the fact this alleged injustice 
occurred nearly 60 years ago it is impossible to develop a sound 
judgment due to the limited information and supporting 
documentation.  

DPSIPE could not determine the applicant’s enlistment grade or 
reason for enlistment grade based upon the documentation 
provided.  However, should the applicant provide additional 
supporting documentation, they would be willing to relook at his 
case.

The complete DPSIPE evaluations are at Exhibits C and D. 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 16 Jan 15, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

1.  The applicant has not shown a sufficient reason for the 
delay in filing on a matter now dating back 60 years, the 
unreasonable delay has caused prejudice to the Air Force as 
relevant records have been destroyed or are no longer available 
which has greatly complicated the ability to determine the 
merits of the applicant’s position.  We are also not persuaded 
the records raises issues of error or injustice which requires 
resolution on the merits based on the lack of official 
documentation to support his request.  

2.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the 
interest of justice to waive the untimeliness.  It is the 
decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as 
untimely.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02066 in Executive Session on 12 Mar 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 14 Jul 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 14 Dec 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jan 15.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800769

    Original file (9800769.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant is requesting he be promoted to A3C (E-2) earlier than 1 Feb 55, the date he was promoted. The applicant enlisted 25 Aug 53 in the grade of Airman Basic (E-l), was promoted to A3C (E-2) 1 Feb 55, promoted to A2C (E-3) 1 Jun 56, promoted to A1C (E-4) 1 Sep 59 (A1C (E-4) redesignated Sgt (Ed)), and to SSgt (E-5) 1 Dec 68.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02380

    Original file (BC-2005-02380.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A military record reflected the applicant’s grade as SSgt on 9 May 43; then as private on 22 Dec 43 with a temporary grade of CPL. They find no documentation in the available records concerning the applicant’s reduction from SSgt to CPL. While the reduction may have been warranted at the time, we are convinced, on the basis of clemency, that some consideration should be given to this applicant’s participation and personal sacrifice during WWII.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00108

    Original file (BC-2011-00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 25 May 11, HQ AFPC/DPSOAA states there is no evidence to support the applicant’s deceased grandfather enlisted rather than being inducted under the selective service system which was highly active during WWII. His date of induction is recorded in block 22 as 16 Feb 42, matching his date of entry on active duty recorded in block 24. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01878

    Original file (BC 2014 01878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01878 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVGC w/P). The applicant served on active duty from 21 Sep 73 through 7 Nov 80, which is after the eligibility dates for award of the VSM or the RVGC w/P. Further, after a thorough review of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01266

    Original file (BC 2014 01266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01266 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Columbus Ohio. In support of her request, she submits a letter of selection for the United States Air Force, dated 27 Jun 72 and an AF Form 941, Statement of Understanding (Delayed Enlistment Program) signed 18 Sep 72; which identifies Columbus Ohio as the place...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03136

    Original file (BC-2002-03136.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03136 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the rank of master sergeant (MSgt) (E-7) effective 1 Sep 93 or later, but not later than 1999, with back pay. The applicant states that he wants two years pay as a CMSgt. The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03136

    Original file (BC-2002-03136.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03136 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the rank of master sergeant (MSgt) (E-7) effective 1 Sep 93 or later, but not later than 1999, with back pay. The applicant states that he wants two years pay as a CMSgt. The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02352

    Original file (BC 2014 02352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following decorations: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of all requested decorations...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00213

    Original file (BC 2014 00213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect: 1. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was promoted to the grade of captain and his records should indicate such. On 17 Aug 02, a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, was issued reflecting award of the PH and POW medals.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01112

    Original file (BC 2014 01112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPSOR administratively corrected the applicant’s record to reflect award of the AFAM, w/1BOLC, the AFOUA, w/2BOLCs, the AFGCM, w/1BOLC, KDSM, and the SAEMR. The applicant’s record has been administratively corrected to reflect award of the AFAM, w/1BOLC, the AFOUA, w/2BOLCs, the AFGCM, w/1BOLC, KDSM, and the SAEMR as requested. After careful review of his record, it has been determined that there are no errors regarding evaluations in his record.